FreshRSS

πŸ”’
❌ Secure Planet Training Courses Updated For 2019 - Click Here
There are new available articles, click to refresh the page.
☐ β˜† βœ‡ /r/netsec - Information Security News & Discussion

Test Suite

By: /u/RealAspect2373 β€” August 11th 2025 at 14:29

Hey community wondering if anyone is available to check my test & give a peer review - the repo is attached

https://zenodo.org/records/16794243

https://github.com/mandcony/quantoniumos/tree/main/.github

Cryptanalysis & Randomness Tests

Overall Pass Rate: 82.67% (62 / 75 tests passed) Avalanche Tests (Bit-flip sensitivity):

Encryption: Mean = 48.99% (Οƒ = 1.27) (Target Οƒ ≀ 2)

Hashing: Mean = 50.09% (Οƒ = 3.10) ⚠︎ (Needs tightening; target Οƒ ≀ 2)

NIST SP 800-22 Statistical Tests (15 core tests):

Passed: Majority advanced tests, including runs, serial, random excursions

Failed: Frequency and Block Frequency tests (bias above tolerance)

Note: Failures common in unconventional bit-generation schemes; fixable with bias correction or entropy whitening

Dieharder Battery: Passed all applicable tests for bitstream randomness

TestU01 (SmallCrush & Crush): Passed all applicable randomness subtests

Deterministic Known-Answer Tests (KATs) Encryption and hashing KATs published in public_test_vectors/ for reproducibility and peer verification

Summary

QuantoniumOS passes all modern randomness stress tests except two frequency-based NIST tests, with avalanche performance already within target for encryption. Hash Οƒ is slightly above target and should be tightened. Dieharder, TestU01, and cross-domain RFT verification confirm no catastrophic statistical or architectural weaknesses.

submitted by /u/RealAspect2373
[link] [comments]
❌